You're looking at an archived, read-only version of our old community forum. See our new community forum here.

So You Think You Can Math

Jacob31593

Location: Tampa, FL

Joined: Jan 04 2009

Discuss

Choose your weapon

no name calling
no eye gouging
no hitting below the belt
no lonlonjp

Add extra parenthesis couple

Hakoria

Laon King

Location: gmt+1

Joined: Apr 03 2011

Add extra parenthesis couple and get the answer you want.

That's my weapon. I vote for = 1

Please excuse my dear aunt

archard

Joined: Jan 11 2007

Please excuse my dear aunt sally, bitch. First calculator got it right.

----------

DANG

w t f for so many reasons

wayfaerer

"Embrace your dreams."

Location: The Lifestream

Joined: Apr 03 2011

w
t
f

for so many reasons

----------

"i seem to be find a lot that apparently dont contain the .exe actually" -Anonymous

"Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to look more like?" -Pherioxus

Re: Please excuse my dear aunt

auriplane

Joined: Sep 06 2008

archard said

Please

excuse

my dear

aunt sally

That only works if you remember that some of the operations are of equal precedence!

----------

Auriplane!!

Yeah, I was gonna say, I

musenji

Joined: Feb 02 2010

Yeah, I was gonna say, I thought * and / held the same "rank".

----------

And then I realized that the chord progression from Chrono Cross's Another World is the same progression as the chorus from Peace of Mind by Boston, and life was never quite the same.

Re: Please excuse my dear aunt

karathrow

Joined: Oct 26 2010

archard said

Please excuse my dear aunt sally, bitch. First calculator got it right.

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiply
Divide
Add
Subtract

With equivalent processes though I think you solve from left to right.

So you solve what's in the parentheses first 2+1=3.

That leaves you with

6/2*3

6/2=3*3=9

at least that was my understanding.

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PEMDAS#Mnemonics

Re: So You Think You Can Math

Parhelion

Joined: Mar 02 2009

Jacob31593 said

no name calling
no eye gouging
no hitting below the belt
no lonlonjp

Wait a minute...I didn't see this before. Is this the work of mods?!

----------

Friend of the pag.

Re: So You Think You Can Math

Jacob31593

Location: Tampa, FL

Joined: Jan 04 2009

Parhelion said

Jacob31593 said

no name calling
no eye gouging
no hitting below the belt
no lonlonjp

Wait a minute...I didn't see this before. Is this the work of mods?!

no that was me

wait a minute.. what? o.0

yashakenkyaku

Joined: Nov 24 2009

I thought it went
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1

Re: wait a minute.. what? o.0

karathrow

Joined: Oct 26 2010

yashakenkyaku said

I thought it went
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1

No, assuming all operations remaining are equal you solve from left to right. So you divide the 6 by 2 instead of multiplying the 2*3.

No other random equation would you jump into the middle of it and start solving it like that. Youre getting hung up on the parantheses. You solve whats IN the parantheses first but multiplying the 2 by the number in the paranthases does not take precedence.

the priority goes like this

1.Parantheses first (anything happening inside of paranthases)

2.Exponents

3. Multiplication and Division (These are equivalent so just solve from left to right)

4. Addition and Subtraction (These are also equivalent so just solve from left to right)

Also I cannot spell parantheses and Im tired of fixing it.

You did all learn this in an

Bhael

Location: Newcastle, UK

Joined: Feb 18 2010

You did all learn this in an early grade of school right?

Arrogance % Deceit (Tabs + YouTube) = Someone

I was going to do something

hslesperance

Location: Walpole, MA

Joined: Aug 10 2008

I was going to do something similar to that Bhael, but you did it much better, Well done. I think you hate lonlonjp more than anyone.

Also karathrow knows how to math

----------

My Original Songs - https://soundcloud.com/hslesperance

I figured, since it'd be

Hakoria

Laon King

Location: gmt+1

Joined: Apr 03 2011

I figured, since it'd be 6/2(1+2) -> 6/[(2x1)+(2x2)] = 6/(2+4) = 6/6 = 1

But yeah, guess x & / could be of equal importance since + & - are, so too bad ;n; will stick to using fraction horizontal bar when dividing and this ambiguity wouldn't happen.

Re: I was going to do something

Bhael

Location: Newcastle, UK

Joined: Feb 18 2010

hslesperance said

I think you hate lonlonjp more than anyone.

XD

Re: I figured, since it'd be

karathrow

Joined: Oct 26 2010

Hakoria said

I figured, since it'd be 6/2(1+2) -> 6/[(2x1)+(2x2)] = 6/(2+4) = 6/6 = 1

But yeah, guess x & / could be of equal importance since + & - are, so too bad ;n; will stick to using fraction horizontal bar when dividing and this ambiguity wouldn't happen.

There's no reason to add the second set of brackets. At that point you are fundamentally changing the equation

6/2(1+2) is not equivalent to 6/[(2x1)+(2x2)]

The mistake is assuming that 2(3) is a parentheses process when it is a multiplication process. You are multiplying 2*3, you are not performing any operation within a parentheses.

It's not really ambiguous because that implies that there is no right answer.

6/2(1+2)=6/2*3

When reading in this format you go left to right and the answer is 9.

yep the black calc got it

StrangeJam

Da Manliness

Joined: Aug 23 2009

yep the silver calc got it right, the answer is 9. Over the reasons kara stated, although I learnt this from the way Java deals with operations lol.

Karathrow, you're thinking of

Ranulf

I will not join your gametabs.

Joined: Oct 15 2009

Karathrow, you're thinking of the equation like the one on the right in the op, when it is actually the one on the left. So the answer is one. Don't use the horizontal division, it makes it confusing.

Re: Karathrow, you're thinking of

karathrow

Joined: Oct 26 2010

Ranulf said

Karathrow, you're thinking of the equation like the one on the right in the op, when it is actually the one on the left. So the answer is one. Don't use the horizontal division, it makes it confusing.

I have no idea what you're saying. Both equations are written identically.

Everybody wins! But I still

hslesperance

Location: Walpole, MA

Joined: Aug 10 2008

Everybody wins!

But I still say the answer is 9

----------

My Original Songs - https://soundcloud.com/hslesperance

damn it hsl, how dare you

Jacob31593

Location: Tampa, FL

Joined: Jan 04 2009

damn it hsl, how dare you

If I remember sixth grade

iamHoustonian

You don’t need to see my identification…

Joined: Oct 03 2011

If I remember sixth grade correctly, I thought Distributive Property always comes first.
Thus making the answer 1, but I guess 9 could be argued as well :)

Look at this If you can't see

Ranulf

I will not join your gametabs.

Joined: Oct 15 2009

Look at this
If you can't see the text here it is:
The equations are not identical. The 2(1+2) means you carry that parenthesis to the bottom with the two. This is really hard to explain, and sorry for the messy writing I was using a mouse :( but the right answer is 1. The only way the third equation would be right is if it started like this (6/2)(1+2) but it was 6/2(1+2).

It is surprising how many

auriplane

Joined: Sep 06 2008

It is surprising how many people think division right-associates. I'd guess it's because when you write e.g. 2÷3(x), they picture the ÷ (or the /) as visually dividing the whole expression into two pieces like a large vinculum, which by convention it does not. So it's intuitive, but wrong. Division has the same precedence as multiplication, so it can't right-associate unless multiplication does--which it doesn't.

Whereas in 2÷3x, there's an implicit multiplication operator between the the 3 and x, and this operator is often given different precedence! So in that case, 2÷3x ≠ 2÷3(x). That fits more in line with the right-associating intuition, probably, but that's not a universal rule!

Which brings me to the point: not every context has the same rules, so write your expressions clearly in the first place, instead of worrying about operator precedence! :-)

----------

Auriplane!!

BTW Ranulf, it's 9, because

auriplane

Joined: Sep 06 2008

BTW Ranulf, it's 9, because division and multiplication are of equal precedence, so you evaluate them left-to-right.

(But it doesn't matter, because it should be written clearly in the first place, and not in a way that defies intuition.)

----------

Auriplane!!

My bad, it has been WAY too

Ranulf

I will not join your gametabs.

Joined: Oct 15 2009

My bad, it has been WAY too long since I've even divided anything horizontally, and I'm used to working with variables anyways. Yes, I was thinking the division sign divided everything into two pieces because it's what I'm used to. This was just written in a confusing way. It's disappointing that I got this wrong, even though I took AP Calculus last year lol.

casio fx-991ES supports 9

SalemJenet

Joined: Sep 22 2011

casio fx-991ES and lonlonjp supports 9

Re: Look at thisIf you can't see

karathrow

Joined: Oct 26 2010

Ranulf said

Look at this
If you can't see the text here it is:
The equations are not identical. The 2(1+2) means you carry that parenthesis to the bottom with the two. This is really hard to explain, and sorry for the messy writing I was using a mouse :( but the right answer is 1. The only way the third equation would be right is if it started like this (6/2)(1+2) but it was 6/2(1+2).

Oh I didn't realize you were talking about the 4 equations below the calculators, I thought you were talking about the left and right calculators.

I still say it's 9 though.

Re: casio fx-991ES supports 9

Hakoria

Laon King

Location: gmt+1

Joined: Apr 03 2011

SalemJenet said

casio fx-991ES and lonlonjp supports 9

And cirno supports ⑨ <:

bakabaka~

There are many benefits of

zxclord123123

Location: US

Joined: Jun 25 2022

There are many benefits of using printable number kindergarten worksheets for preschool children. These worksheets are great for practice, math centers, and home use. The worksheets range from 11 to 20. Kids can practice their counting skills by coloring the pictures according to the color key or by making posters displaying their number skills. These worksheets are also great for practicing handwriting and number formation skills. They are ideal for parents and educators who want to introduce numbers to their children.

----------

Mathematics is gymnastics for the mind. Like it or not, but in the process of studying, qualities that affect the way of thinking will grow stronger. To do this, it is not necessary to study in a specialized class and participate in Olympiads — solving ev

Math is a subject that can be

Jeffrey76

Joined: Jul 08 2022

Math is a subject that can be difficult to understand, especially when you have a less than stellar math education. I actually vote it for one if you follow DMAS rule of mathematics. Xổ số